SPLAT-2826: Promote VSphereMultiVCenterDay2 to GA - #2968
Conversation
|
Pipeline controller notification For optional jobs, comment This repository is configured in: LGTM mode |
|
@vr4manta: This pull request references SPLAT-2826 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "5.0.0" version, but no target version was set. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
Hello @vr4manta! Some important instructions when contributing to openshift/api: |
|
Note Reviews pausedIt looks like this branch is under active development. To avoid overwhelming you with review comments due to an influx of new commits, CodeRabbit has automatically paused this review. You can configure this behavior by changing the Use the following commands to manage reviews:
Use the checkboxes below for quick actions:
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe change enables Suggested reviewers: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 15✅ Passed checks (15 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
PR Summary by QodoPromote VSphereMultiVCenterDay2 to GA and harden vSphere CRD validations
AI Description
Diagram
High-Level Assessment
Files changed (14)
|
Code Review by Qodo🐞 Bugs (0) 📘 Rule violations (0) 📎 Requirement gaps (0)
Great, no issues found!Qodo reviewed your code and found no material issues that require reviewTo customize comments, go to the Qodo configuration screen, or learn more in the docs. |
|
/retest |
| - op: remove | ||
| path: /spec/versions/0/schema/openAPIV3Schema/properties/spec/properties/platformSpec/properties/vsphere/properties/vcenters/minItems | ||
| - op: remove | ||
| path: /spec/versions/0/schema/openAPIV3Schema/properties/spec/properties/platformSpec/properties/vsphere/x-kubernetes-validations/0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nit: patching by array index (x-kubernetes-validations/0) is fragile; if the rule order changes in a future generation, this silently patches out the wrong rule. Not a blocker since it matches the current generated output, but worth noting.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
i agree. i wasn't sure of a way to patch it out for ratcheting tests. Is there something better i can do for this test?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
CEL validation rules are correct across all edge cases (pure adds, removes, swaps, simultaneous add+remove, no-change updates, failure domain cross-validation). Promotion mechanics are sound, ratcheting is handled properly.
One minor nit: config/v1/types_infrastructure.go:1699 still says "in TechPreview" in the vcenters godoc, but the field is now Default.
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: saschagrunert The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
I'll update the infrastructure go file to no longer mention TechPreview. |
|
Note GitHub couldn't provide a complete incremental comparison for this pull request, so CodeRabbit is performing a full review instead. This review may take a little longer. |
|
Note GitHub couldn't provide a complete incremental comparison for this pull request, so CodeRabbit is performing a full review instead. This review may take a little longer. |
|
Need to rebase and get this new featuregate variant updated. |
|
Note GitHub couldn't provide a complete incremental comparison for this pull request, so CodeRabbit is performing a full review instead. This review may take a little longer. |
| productScope(ocpSpecific). | ||
| enhancementPR("https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/1961"). | ||
| enable(inTechPreviewNoUpgrade(), inDevPreviewNoUpgrade()). | ||
| enable(inDefault(), inOKD(), inTechPreviewNoUpgrade(), inDevPreviewNoUpgrade()). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
verify-feature-promotion is failing: [sig-cluster-lifecycle][OCPFeatureGate:VSphereMultiVCenterDay2][platform:vsphere] vSphere failure domain ValidatingAdmissionPolicies should block removing a failure domain referenced by a Machine has a 72% pass rate (needs >= 95%). This blocks promotion.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I can run some more. Its odd cause i see 84 percent in sippy.
|
/retest |
|
@vr4manta: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
SPLAT-2826
Changes